Re: Year of first commit

From: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Year of first commit
Date: 2025-01-21 18:20:08
Message-ID: CAB-JLwbkNFbxbChEKsGfU_Zk=kVd4_Zkoc_xuP7r-LBe=HWw1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em ter., 21 de jan. de 2025 às 14:50, Álvaro Herrera <
alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> escreveu:

> I have to ask, why do you think this is important?
>

I'm just reading sources, navigating on files history and learning, so
don't be furious with me.
Why is this important ? Well, if that file has a 2014-2025, I can know how
old it is, more or less which version was included, etc
Additionally, I see all of you adding or removing a single letter to
sources, why not adjust those years on header files ?
regards
Marcos

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey M. Borodin 2025-01-21 18:24:12 Re: Compression of bigger WAL records
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-01-21 18:12:05 Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql