Re: altering a column's collation leaves an invalid foreign key

From: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: altering a column's collation leaves an invalid foreign key
Date: 2024-11-29 14:25:57
Message-ID: CAB-JLwb4rG0FScRua1R5Or5Sz0YBOy3ryF0Gp18G-SYQOaUdAg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em ter., 19 de nov. de 2024 às 13:27, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
escreveu:

> 3. Some documentation updates to explain some of the differences between
> NO ACTION and RESTRICT better.
>

There is a typo on your commit "doc: Improve description of referential
actions"

There is also a noticeable difference between <literal>ON UPDATE NO
+ ACTION</literal> (the default) and <literal>NO UPDATE
RESTRICT</literal>.

Should be ON UPDATE RESTRICT, right ?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2024-11-29 15:20:02 Re: relfilenode statistics
Previous Message Kirill Reshke 2024-11-29 14:00:37 Re: CREATE SCHEMA ... CREATE DOMAIN support