Re: Year of first commit

From: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Year of first commit
Date: 2025-01-21 17:31:59
Message-ID: CAB-JLwa3Kf2K6L=6iaC=abafxpuFGJaRUCwLWA4z1Yj8-5VBFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em ter., 21 de jan. de 2025 às 12:36, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> escreveu:

> so we prefer to use the same copyright dates as related older files even
> in less
> clear-cut cases.
>

Thank you Tom for your time.

But these numbers seem inaccurate, because there are 1644 copyright strings
but 1521 are 1996-2025. So, JSONB, BRIN, FDW, Logical Replication and lots
of
others, all of them were started in 1996 or have any related code ?

regards
Marcos

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-01-21 17:43:17 Re: Year of first commit
Previous Message Anthonin Bonnefoy 2025-01-21 17:20:22 Re: Accept recovery conflict interrupt on blocked writing