Re: minor doc issue in 9.16.2.1.1. Boolean Predicate Check Expressions

From: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: minor doc issue in 9.16.2.1.1. Boolean Predicate Check Expressions
Date: 2024-10-17 17:47:57
Message-ID: CAB-JLwZEFPjPBxc4qiwXxXKDFfeVEStDSG_6YzpfvQjBPzfzQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em qui., 17 de out. de 2024 às 13:31, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
escreveu:

> Oh, okay, but I think we need to say JSON null so we are clear --- patch
>

But true, false and null are all JSON, since you cannot do
select jsonb_path_query('{}'::jsonb,'$.track.segments[*].HR > 130') = true;

So, it would be better to be clear that all possible returned values are
JSON, no ?

regards
Marcos

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Lakhin 2024-10-17 18:00:00 Re: ECPG cleanup and fix for clang compile-time problem
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2024-10-17 16:51:59 Re: Add reject_limit option to file_fdw