From: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeremy Whiting <jwhiting(at)redhat(dot)com> |
Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
Date: | 2016-01-12 12:37:09 |
Message-ID: | CAB=Je-H5MEX9_UnXWQw9ceTT2iGaM1wRaFbxRoY9xFrgvRp3JQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Jeremy,
The issue is easily reproducible in plain psql.
It has nothing to do with jdbc driver.
It has nothing to do with date-time either.
> I think you'll find initial executions (Bind) use the paramater type org.postgresql.core.Oid.UNSPECIFIED for the date time.
Does $1 = '180', $2 = '1' or $3 = '7728' look like a date-time value?
Vladimir
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-01-12 12:42:53 | Allow to specify (auto-)vacuum cost limits relative to the database/cluster size? |
Previous Message | Jeremy Whiting | 2016-01-12 12:33:01 | Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2016-01-12 13:26:35 | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
Previous Message | Jeremy Whiting | 2016-01-12 12:33:01 | Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |