Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)

From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>, Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
Date: 2016-01-19 21:56:27
Message-ID: CAB=Je-GX+RXau0wPO0HcOXA5uNwXROtHS41jF=wC7AD1f_Zy9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

>You are asking why we don't add waffle into Fedora?

No. I am not.

I am asking: "can you kindly provide a build log of a failed due to
waffle build?"
In other words, "a fedora build log before #495, and a fedora build
log after #495 is merged in".

Alternative: can you provide a test case that *fails* without #495?

Unfortunately, current #495 has no tests behind. All tests pass
without #495, thus the change does almost nothing.

Vladimir

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 张元超 2016-01-20 02:14:48 One question about callablestatement
Previous Message Pavel Raiskup 2016-01-19 21:16:10 Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)