| From: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
| Date: | 2016-01-12 16:01:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAB=Je-FzFg-gKq8RUkEiXG=XDcXwoZa+Rn8o7XzwNjjJ3_rNJA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
VS>>Why doesn't backend reuse already existing good plan?
PS>this logic is driven by plan cost, not by plan execution time.
It do understand that currently PG replans with $1, $2 and uses
default selectivities for that.
What I am asking is to make PG aware of "previously used bind values",
so it would calculate proper selectivities for $1, $2.
PS. It is not the first time the problem bites me, so I hand-crafted a testcase.
Vladimir
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-01-12 16:16:54 | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-01-12 15:56:46 | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-01-12 16:16:54 | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-01-12 15:55:47 | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |