Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] PGSERVICEFILE as a connection string parameter

From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] PGSERVICEFILE as a connection string parameter
Date: 2018-05-28 14:19:25
Message-ID: CAB=Je-FafxwXqOVHMQOcVo0-vx699-n1x8uZFuiqb_tsq4Bz=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

David>I'm guessing that the Java port wouldn't be too
complicated. It's already well defined.

Is encoding defined somewhere for the "service file"?
I don't like the idea of using "a default" very much.

Vladimir

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-05-28 15:01:25 Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2018-05-28 11:40:50 Re: Undo logs

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mickey Cohen 2018-05-30 16:33:22 ssl tests jdbc fail
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2018-05-28 13:01:18 Re: IN or ANY for batch queries