| From: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
| Date: | 2016-11-28 16:56:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAB=Je-FSPzRF-hH0bsDwC5_T+R1emfQwhUWWVQ6wSyMmWyJTkA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
>I guess there is no schedule defined to the 42.0.0 release, maybe late
december, early january, or there are intentions to be early december?
Technically speaking the aim is to have a month or two between releases.
Well, current milestone has slipped a bit
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/milestones, however there are just a
couple of issues due.
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/690 "executeBatch vs
serverprepared=0" -- needs review
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/611 "feat: allow byte[] and String to
be accessed as .getLob, and .getClob" -- test should be reviewed (e.g.
assert messages added)
Vladimir
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jorge Solórzano | 2016-11-28 21:06:43 | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
| Previous Message | Jorge Solórzano | 2016-11-28 16:43:03 | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |