Re: SQLJSON

From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Markus KARG <markus(at)headcrashing(dot)eu>
Cc: List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQLJSON
Date: 2015-06-30 16:46:36
Message-ID: CAB=Je-F-m=e7zF7QxpDwDsokhTYHLYf6CMnu+rmGvF-yFRap+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

I think we have all the input from Álvaro.

It boils down to "including javax.json classes into pgdjbc is fine,
and if it creates a problem we can release a new version that removes
the dependency". This is how I read your "In brief: users don't
realize they need another dependency"

However, regarding POLA you say "compile dependency" which means you
suggest _not_ including javax.json into pgjdbc.jar

Can you please tell us if "using compile type dependency for both
javax.json and RI" suits you?

Vladimir

In response to

Responses

  • Re: SQLJSON at 2015-06-30 16:49:18 from Vladimir Sitnikov

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2015-06-30 16:49:18 Re: SQLJSON
Previous Message Markus KARG 2015-06-30 16:26:45 Re: SQLJSON