Re: Version question

From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Version question
Date: 2016-03-14 14:05:05
Message-ID: CAB=Je-EDQWKYN9j3ZK4Y6G86Ja8aH9d=RNBSZOzkMVBbgsJ7eg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Well, what if we indeed release 9.5.x just to note that "it is at
least helloworld-compatible with backend 9.5"?

I guess as long as pgjdbc's versions are "close" to backend's
versions, users would be confused if those are compatible.
So it looks we either have to release pgjdbc 9.5.x, or release
something like 42.x.y

Any thoughts?

Vladimir

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2016-03-14 14:14:42 Re: Version question
Previous Message Campbell, Lance 2016-03-14 13:40:29 Re: Version question