| From: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Hernández <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <vit(at)tym(dot)im> |
| Subject: | Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please |
| Date: | 2016-01-25 13:08:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAB=Je-E8Em-3fvzb-86_D5DMC+FBF6K5K2D-e-9szUfJKDHzNw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Pavel> nobody else needs it on Fedora
How do you know that?
pgjdbc/src/main/java/org/postgresql/osgi/PGDataSourceFactory.java is
one of the public end-points for pgjdbc.
What you are saying is just: "nobody cares OSGi".
Google gives 800K results for OSGi. Stack overflow gives 15K. It is
not that wise to just drop OSGi.
Vladimir>>xisting sources (that are available at Maven
Vladimir>> Central).
Pavel>How?
Pavel>This is important question -- do they require maven?
I think they do. Their source repository is full of pom.xml files.
Pavel> So how can they use jar from our RPMs?
What is the purpose of packaging pgjdbc.jar into RPM then if jar files
are not "accessible"?
Vladimir
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vitalii Tymchyshyn | 2016-01-25 13:17:41 | Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please |
| Previous Message | Pavel Raiskup | 2016-01-25 12:55:54 | Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please |