From: | bruno vieira da silva <brunogiovs(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Query planning read a large amount of buffers for partitioned tables |
Date: | 2025-01-15 18:29:30 |
Message-ID: | CAB+Nuk9NAH8MxDK9ng9G+Vvs8XAaaV7Jc=F7FWrbF8U8WWaDEw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hello All.
On pg 17 now we have better visibility on the I/O required during query
planning.
so, as part of an ongoing design work for table partitioning I was
analyzing the performance implications of having more or less partitions.
In one of my tests of a table with 200 partitions using explain showed a
large amount of buffers read during planning. around 12k buffers.
I observed that query planning seems to have a caching mechanism as
subsequent similar queries require only a fraction of buffers read during
query planning.
However, this "caching" seems to be per session as if I end the client
session and I reconnect the same query execution will require again to read
12k buffer for query planning.
Does pg have any mechanism to mitigate this issue ( new sessions need to
read a large amount of buffers for query planning) ? or should I mitigate
this issue by the use of connection pooling.
How is this caching done? Is there a way to have viability on its usage?
Where is it stored?
Thanks
--
Bruno Vieira da Silva
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | bruno vieira da silva | 2025-01-15 18:32:27 | Re: Query planning read a large amount of buffers for partitioned tables |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2025-01-15 07:28:13 | Re: Re: proposal: schema variables |