From: | Eugen Konkov <konkove(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Documentation does not describes format for access privileges: =Tc/user |
Date: | 2023-12-25 17:48:31 |
Message-ID: | CAAwmOLxHUERXUyOpgbb1-7x0Yo_+r8fVQpVeQ84pG9wGEKtUwQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
No, it does not. If you refer to `An empty grantee field in an aclitem
stands for PUBLIC.` then "grantee field" was never described. What is
this?
It would be very clear if it was described in this way:
The access privileges has the following format: "grantee=privileges/who grants".
On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 10:13 AM David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Friday, December 22, 2023, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/ddl-priv.html
>> Description:
>>
>> Hello.
>> The page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-priv.html does not
>> describe what =Tc/user means. Also I did not find a link to appropriate page
>> which describes this.
>> Specifically I do not understand how 'user=Tc/user' differs from
>> '=Tc/user'.
>>
>> It would be nice if documentation will be extended.
>>
>
> The paragraph immediately following table 5.2 describes all of this.
>
> David J.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-12-25 18:02:57 | Re: Documentation does not describes format for access privileges: =Tc/user |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-12-24 15:12:58 | Re: Documentation does not describes format for access privileges: =Tc/user |