Re: is libpq and openssl 1.1.* compatible?

From: Konstantin Izmailov <pgfizm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: is libpq and openssl 1.1.* compatible?
Date: 2018-02-27 04:03:51
Message-ID: CAAw-Msfy5Nct4=+tw_Rsp63o6NwXdhwbNtCCgW27k5KQNVHgYg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thank you everyone who posted answers! I went back to openssl-1.0.2.

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:15 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:30:38AM -0700, Konstantin Izmailov wrote:
> > Let me ask this differently: can Visual Studio 2013/2017 compile libpq
> with
> > openssl 1.1 support? Under Windows?
>
> The answer to this question should be yes. (Please note that no
> Windows buildfarm machines use openssl 1.1.0 as far as I can see, I
> myself build stuff with 1.0.2 on Windows.)
>
> > I have not been able to find an answer by googling before asking this
> > question here. Can someone share the compiled library and changes in the
> > source if needed for the openssl 1.1? Magnus please.
>
> No changes should be needed as far as I know in the scripts in
> src/tools/msvc. The set of APIs present in 1.1.0 is the same whatever
> the platform so the compatibility is the same, and the dependent
> libraries should be ssleay32.lib and libeay32.lib whose location depend
> on your installation of OpenSSL.
> --
> Michael
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Saffron 2018-02-27 05:03:36 Why is tuple_percent so low?
Previous Message Melvin Davidson 2018-02-27 02:24:14 Re: system catalog permissions