Re: is libpq and openssl 1.1.* compatible?

From: Konstantin Izmailov <pgfizm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: is libpq and openssl 1.1.* compatible?
Date: 2018-02-26 07:30:38
Message-ID: CAAw-MscUBcyor3fQ4W4853L_6N+9kGZwW1wpr2ZuPza1dEt_kQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Let me ask this differently: can Visual Studio 2013/2017 compile libpq with
openssl 1.1 support? Under Windows?

I have not been able to find an answer by googling before asking this
question here. Can someone share the compiled library and changes in the
source if needed for the openssl 1.1? Magnus please.

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 10:44 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 09:06:39PM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> > On 02/25/2018 08:36 PM, Konstantin Izmailov wrote:
> >> I wonder if I'm not doing smth right, or libpq is not compatible with
> >> openssl 1.1? Please help.
>
> The answer to the second question is that libpq is compatible with
> OpenSSL 1.1.0 since this commit:
> commit: 593d4e47db7af1a3a5dd6b6b1971f181b5566dbd
> author: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi>
> date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 14:42:29 +0300
> Support OpenSSL 1.1.0.
>
> This applies down to 9.5. Porting got a bit more difficult with 9.4 and
> older versions. As 1.0.2 is LTS, meaning that it will become EOL after
> 1.1.0, porting 1.1.0 does not matter much as most application are going
> to use 1.0.2 in priority (I do so for one).
>
> > Do you have openssl-dev(el) installed?
>
> Most likely that's the problem. Debian does this package split for
> example.
> --
> Michael
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-02-26 08:15:59 Re: is libpq and openssl 1.1.* compatible?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-02-26 05:44:45 Re: is libpq and openssl 1.1.* compatible?