| From: | Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Infinite Interval |
| Date: | 2023-01-15 16:44:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAAvxfHe4GhFESzKXDyj8NdqcRLUDGX5SGO4Y2eX9qAgu3_r-Ow@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 4:22 PM Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> At this point the patch is ready for review again except for the one
> outstanding question of: Should finite checks on intervals only look at
> months or all three fields?
>
> - Joe
I've gone ahead and updated the patch to only look at the months field.
I'll submit this email and patch to the Feb commitfest.
- Joe
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v12-0001-Support-infinite-interval.patch | text/x-patch | 95.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2023-01-15 16:47:00 | Re: [RFC] Add jit deform_counter |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-15 16:34:53 | Re: UPDATE operation terminates logical replication receiver process due to an assertion |