Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping

From: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping
Date: 2024-07-13 14:24:16
Message-ID: CAAvxfHdX-t03LvxROxbyodBrtzBzZQEKdKB0FCpEr+p1JnFxsA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 12:49 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 07:04:38PM -0400, Joseph Koshakow wrote:
>> I've added another patch, 0004, to resolve the jsonb wrap-arounds.
>>
>> The other patches, 0001, 0002, and 0003 are unchanged but have their
>> version number incremented.
>
> IIUC some of these changes are bug fixes. Can we split out the bug fixes
> to their own patches so that they can be back-patched?

They happen to already be split out into their own patches. 0002 and
0003 are both bug fixes (in the sense that they fix queries that
produce incorrect results even with -fwrapv). They also both apply
cleanly to master. If it would be useful, I can re-order the patches so
that the bug-fixes are first.

Thanks,
Joe Koshakow

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-07-13 15:40:43 Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping
Previous Message Pavel Luzanov 2024-07-13 12:21:05 Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column