From: | Henry Drexler <alonup8tb(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jack Christensen <jackc(at)hylesanderson(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Why does aggregate query allow select of non-group by or aggregate values? |
Date: | 2011-12-09 22:51:54 |
Message-ID: | CAAtgU9RNoFPTdtKDii9kCYkLQk7XTs9CACj2TPJsED_9PwxrCA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Jack Christensen <jackc(at)hylesanderson(dot)edu>wrote:
> CREATE TABLE people(
> id serial PRIMARY KEY,
> name varchar NOT NULL
> );
>
> INSERT INTO people(name) VALUES('Adam'), ('Adam'), ('Adam'), ('Bill'),
> ('Sam'), ('Joe'), ('Joe');
>
> SELECT name, count(*), random()
> FROM people
> GROUP BY name;
>
>
> I would expect this query to cause an error because of random(). I ran
> into this using an array produced by a subquery as a column in the select
> of an aggregate query, but I was able to boil it down to this contrived
> example. Shouldn't any expression that is not in the group by or an
> aggregate function be rejected?
>
> What am I not understanding?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Jack Christensen
> jackc(at)hylesanderson(dot)edu
>
>
I don't know the answer, but I would guess that as random() is not known
before hand , it has no reason being in the grouped by.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Johnston | 2011-12-09 22:57:39 | Re: Why does aggregate query allow select of non-group by or aggregate values? |
Previous Message | Jack Christensen | 2011-12-09 22:48:00 | Why does aggregate query allow select of non-group by or aggregate values? |