From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Surely this code in setrefs.c is wrong? |
Date: | 2023-09-13 23:57:11 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvruz2irxACqN57MJw3Vd0jOqa+8xFuG5Mz0q_XPpOir2A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 10 Sept 2023 at 21:07, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Sept 2023 at 11:22, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > if (!OidIsValid(saop->hashfuncid))
> > record_plan_function_dependency(root, saop->hashfuncid);
> >
> > if (!OidIsValid(saop->negfuncid))
> > record_plan_function_dependency(root, saop->negfuncid);
> >
> > Surely those if-conditions are exactly backward, and we should be
> > recording nonzero hashfuncid and negfuncid entries, not zero ones.
>
> I'll push fixes once the 16.0 release is out of the way.
Fixed in ee3a551e9.
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-09-14 00:01:39 | Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2023-09-13 23:39:05 | Re: Redundant Unique plan node for table with a unique index |