On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 12:53, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It would be interesting to see a non-artificial example that took
> into account when the last auto-vacuum and auto-analyze really
> happened, so we could see if there's any less-fragile way of
> dealing with this situation.
I think we need to find a way to give some additional preference to
using indexes with more keys matching to quals.
David