Re: Parent/child context relation in pg_get_backend_memory_contexts()

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parent/child context relation in pg_get_backend_memory_contexts()
Date: 2024-07-15 10:46:15
Message-ID: CAApHDvrRtp0UoMyAkjnnb60jRvMN0bY1VtyeMy-ow_fXeSAawg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 at 10:33, Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've been also thinking if we should still have the parent column, as finding out the parent is also possible via looking into the path. What do you think?

I think we should probably consider removing it. Let's think about
that later. I don't think its existence is blocking us from
progressing here.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2024-07-15 10:47:14 Re: New function normal_rand_array function to contrib/tablefunc.
Previous Message David Rowley 2024-07-15 10:43:56 Re: Parent/child context relation in pg_get_backend_memory_contexts()