Re: Some ExecSeqScan optimizations

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Some ExecSeqScan optimizations
Date: 2025-01-10 10:37:55
Message-ID: CAApHDvrPBrFBwddzkaLFRZ22h_=TPaFBCfn=T+ofn7R2s3Nf_A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 at 22:22, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 1:06 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I can look if performance tests show
> > that it might be worthwhile considering.
>
> Sure, that would be great.

What I wanted to know was if 0002 shows any additional gains over just
0001. If there isn't any, I didn't see the point in looking at it.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anthonin Bonnefoy 2025-01-10 10:59:44 Re: Add Pipelining support in psql
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-01-10 10:36:12 Re: Some ExecSeqScan optimizations