From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ankit Kumar Pandey <itsankitkp(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction |
Date: | 2022-11-15 21:03:50 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvqnMyofRKZQPLEuS4gExmXZeKJvdRwY5JyPdWjc6VaYOg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you for looking at the patch.
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 04:43, Ankit Kumar Pandey <itsankitkp(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't see any performance improvement in tests.
Are you able to share what your test was?
In order to see a performance improvement you're likely going to have
to obtain a large number of locks in the session so that the local
lock table becomes bloated, then continue to run some fast query and
observe that LockReleaseAll has become slower as a result of the hash
table becoming bloated. Running pgbench running a SELECT on a hash
partitioned table with a good number of partitions to look up a single
row with -M prepared. The reason this becomes slow is that the
planner will try a generic plan on the 6th execution which will lock
every partition and bloat the local lock table. From then on it will
use a custom plan which only locks a single leaf partition.
I just tried the following:
$ pgbench -i --partition-method=hash --partitions=1000 postgres
Master:
$ pgbench -T 60 -S -M prepared postgres | grep tps
tps = 21286.172326 (without initial connection time)
Patched:
$ pgbench -T 60 -S -M prepared postgres | grep tps
tps = 23034.063261 (without initial connection time)
If I try again with 10,000 partitions, I get:
Master:
$ pgbench -T 60 -S -M prepared postgres | grep tps
tps = 13044.290903 (without initial connection time)
Patched:
$ pgbench -T 60 -S -M prepared postgres | grep tps
tps = 22683.545686 (without initial connection time)
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-11-15 21:08:35 | Re: meson oddities |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-11-15 21:03:38 | Re: SUBTRANS: Minimizing calls to SubTransSetParent() |