From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, lauri(dot)laanmets(at)eesti(dot)ee, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Memory leak on subquery as scalar operand |
Date: | 2022-11-01 04:26:16 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvqn55aqReCSAd9tpf06JV0sx=DYON+djSv1BqkJZ+NH_Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 17:10, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Maybe the different "inlining" choice makes a difference?
The single subquery version also crashes for me, so perhaps it's just
the amount of memory that's being used and when the OOM killer is
triggering.
It crashes even when I set jit_inline_above_cost and
jit_optimize_above_cost above the query's cost.
postgres=# set jit_optimize_above_cost=10000000;
SET
postgres=# set jit_inline_above_cost=10000000;
SET
postgres=# set jit=0;
SET
postgres=# explain verbose SELECT
id,
(SELECT count(*) FROM leak_test y WHERE y.id=l.id) as y_result
FROM leak_test l;
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on public.leak_test l (cost=0.00..941723.86 rows=112965 width=12)
Output: l.id, (SubPlan 1)
SubPlan 1
-> Aggregate (cost=8.31..8.32 rows=1 width=8)
Output: count(*)
-> Index Only Scan using leak_test_pkey on
public.leak_test y (cost=0.29..8.31 rows=1 width=0)
Output: y.id
Index Cond: (y.id = l.id)
(8 rows)
postgres=# set jit=1;
SET
postgres=# explain verbose SELECT
id,
(SELECT count(*) FROM leak_test y WHERE y.id=l.id) as y_result
FROM leak_test l;
server closed the connection unexpectedly
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-11-01 04:52:16 | Re: Memory leak on subquery as scalar operand |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-11-01 04:10:02 | Re: Memory leak on subquery as scalar operand |