| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions |
| Date: | 2022-04-05 20:21:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvqjNwoQeLYN5imUSA9uy479Lz7BR8hcYS2siRzj04=XGg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 at 02:27, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>
> This is failing regression tests. I don't understand how this patch
> could be affecting this test though. Perhaps it's a problem with the
> json patches that were committed recently -- but they don't seem to be
> causing other patches to fail.
I think this will just be related to the useprefix =
list_length(es->rtable) > 1; in show_plan_tlist(). There's likely not
much point in keeping the RTE for the view anymore. IIRC it was just
there to check permissions. Amit has now added another way of doing
those.
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-04-05 20:29:38 | Re: should vacuum's first heap pass be read-only? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-04-05 20:10:38 | Re: should vacuum's first heap pass be read-only? |