| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path |
| Date: | 2020-11-03 20:53:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvqiusDMB37H9VRLCjUWrji3sxFy_Tma7_R0twoAp-kRrg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 20:08, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-09-29 11:26, David Rowley wrote:
> > I've marked this patch back as waiting for review. It would be good if
> > someone could run some tests on some intel hardware and see if they
> > can see any speedup.
>
> What is the way forward here? What exactly would you like to have tested?
It would be good to see some small scale bench -S tests with and
without -M prepared.
Also, small scale TPC-H tests would be good. I really only did
testing on new AMD hardware, so some testing on intel hardware would
be good.
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-11-03 21:39:42 | Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-11-03 20:44:10 | Re: Deleting older versions in unique indexes to avoid page splits |