From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg16: XX000: could not find pathkey item to sort |
Date: | 2023-10-09 04:13:09 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvqira92LLPbW37azL+fDEm7yvWni89YekB9G751W7nEBw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 12:42, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Maybe it's worth checking the total planning time spent in a run of
> the regression tests with and without the patch to see how much
> overhead it adds to the "average case".
I've now pushed the patch that trims off the Pathkeys for the ORDER BY
/ DISTINCT aggregates.
As for the patch to verify the pathkeys during create plan, I patched
master with the attached plan_times.patch.txt and used the following
to check the time spent in the planner for 3 runs of make
installcheck.
$ for i in {1..3}; do pg_ctl start -D pgdata -l plantime.log >
/dev/null && cd pg_src && make installcheck > /dev/null && cd .. &&
grep "planning time in" plantime.log|sed -E -e 's/.*planning time in
(.*) nanoseconds/\1/'|awk '{nanoseconds += $1} END{print nanoseconds}'
&& pg_ctl stop -D pgdata > /dev/null && rm plantime.log; done
Master:
1855788104
1839655412
1740769066
Patched:
1917797221
1766606115
1881322655
Those results are a bit noisy. Perhaps a few more runs might yield
more consistency, but it seems that there's not too much overhead to
it. If I take the minimum value out of the 3 runs from each, it comes
to about 1.5% extra time spent in planning. Perhaps that's OK.
David
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
plan_times.patch.txt | text/plain | 1014 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2023-10-09 04:28:47 | Re: Making aggregate deserialization (and WAL receive) functions slightly faster |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2023-10-09 04:08:46 | Re: REL_15_STABLE: pgbench tests randomly failing on CI, Windows only |