Re: Redundant Result node

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Redundant Result node
Date: 2024-08-22 12:02:48
Message-ID: CAApHDvqWSmLMJnVCK86LY2cWz=y03-6cP2rTScqXPu8GQG18PQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 at 23:33, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> > I wonder if we need to invent a function to compare two PathTargets.
>
> Wouldn't the normal node equal() work?

It might. I think has_volatile_expr might be missing a
pg_node_attr(equal_ignore).

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lakshmi Narayana Velayudam 2024-08-22 12:07:13 Usage of ProcessConfigfile in SIGHUP_Handler
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2024-08-22 12:02:42 Re: type cache cleanup improvements