Re: v17 Possible Union All Bug

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Bug List <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: v17 Possible Union All Bug
Date: 2024-01-27 00:36:22
Message-ID: CAApHDvqGS=y2EgzLLJLBqPu0Cms9kecVs7H3ZG2pz9ofL9r3zg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 13:19, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Are the results correct if you SET enable_presorted_aggregate=0;?

For the record, I don't get the same results as you. Perhaps you have
some other roles that I don't have.

I see:
oid | role_type | rolname | rolsuper | administration
-------+-----------+--------------------+----------+----------------
42077 | User | u6_green_leader_su | f |
(1 row)

It might be worth trying to make the repro more self-contained. Can
you swap out the auth table with a mockup of it?

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yongtao Huang 2024-01-27 17:32:08 Re: BUG #18310: Some SQL commands fail to process duplicate objects with error: tuple already updated by self
Previous Message David Rowley 2024-01-27 00:19:13 Re: v17 Possible Union All Bug