Re: Streaming I/O, vectored I/O (WIP)

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Streaming I/O, vectored I/O (WIP)
Date: 2024-05-01 02:50:57
Message-ID: CAApHDvq678Ym4ZbXyAJubTUr1SpRhB=i7fmLkW7b+Mh1m0AX4Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 14:32, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've attached a patch with a few typo fixes and what looks like an
> incorrect type for max_ios. It's an int16 and I think it needs to be
> an int. Doing "max_ios = Min(max_ios, PG_INT16_MAX);" doesn't do
> anything when max_ios is int16.

No feedback, so I'll just push this in a few hours unless anyone has anything.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2024-05-01 02:55:33 Re: pgsql: Introduce "builtin" collation provider.
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-05-01 02:45:27 Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation