Re: Performance degradation on concurrent COPY into a single relation in PG16.

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance degradation on concurrent COPY into a single relation in PG16.
Date: 2023-08-07 06:16:19
Message-ID: CAApHDvq65XvD-5roRwm8TLALQ01KC4CijOD7AELRtw5qy2nF8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 13:35, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So, it looks like this item can be closed off. I'll hold off from
> doing that for a few days just in case anyone else wants to give
> feedback or test themselves.

Alright, closed.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-08-07 06:18:12 Re: Fix a comment in paraminfo_get_equal_hashops
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2023-08-07 05:59:31 Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node