Re: Question: test "aggregates" failed in 32-bit machine

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: Question: test "aggregates" failed in 32-bit machine
Date: 2022-10-02 20:35:55
Message-ID: CAApHDvpxPyGgkDi3Kk30zXOAswz=nAWX_ryo=vLeg_eeUx_9aA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 08:10, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> As attached.

For the master version, I think it's safe just to get rid of
PlannerInfo.num_groupby_pathkeys now. I only added that so I could
strip off the ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregate PathKeys from the group by
pathkeys before passing to the functions that rearranged the GROUP BY
clause.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-10-02 20:52:01 Re: CI and test improvements
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-10-02 20:22:01 Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops