Re: Proposals for EXPLAIN: rename ANALYZE to EXECUTE and extend VERBOSE

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Christofides <michael(at)pgmustard(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposals for EXPLAIN: rename ANALYZE to EXECUTE and extend VERBOSE
Date: 2024-12-10 02:57:43
Message-ID: CAApHDvpj0Cj6Z8VnDN5htzF24b4_hKL+1_n=HOehLHkBK_E_TQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 at 08:30, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> OK, I'm fine with this. v4 patch attached with one plan showing read, written, and dirtied buffers.

Today I spent more time polishing this patch. There were a few cases
in the docs that displayed EXPLAIN ANALYZE output that you'd not
adjusted to include the buffers output or adjusted to do BUFFERS OFF.
I think I've got all these now. Tom went to some effort to fix some
outdated EXPLAIN outputs for v17 in 5caa05749, so I think we owe it to
him not to let these go out of date so soon after that change.

I also was thinking again about what Robert mentioned about
auto_explain.log_buffers should now also be on by default. I'm less
certain than him about this change. It seems like a separate
consideration that we could apply many of the same arguments for the
main change to. In any case, I extracted that change from the 0001
patch and put it in a 0002 patch as it doesn't seem like something
that should be a sidenote in the commit message. I felt doing that
increases the chances that it would be overlooked in the release
notes.

I was very close to pushing 0001 today, but will hold off until
tomorrow to see if anyone has final comments.

For 0002, I'd really like to see a bit more justification for it. For
the record, I'm not against 0002, it's just that my personal arguments
for wanting 0001 don't apply to 0002.

David

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-Enable-BUFFERS-by-default-with-EXPLAIN-ANALYZE.patch application/octet-stream 97.7 KB
v5-0002-Enable-auto_explain.log_buffers-by-default.patch application/octet-stream 2.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-10 03:20:59 Re: Fix some comments for GUC hooks of timezone_abbreviations
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-12-10 02:52:40 Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)