On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 05:49, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've attached the patch. I added the minimum regression tests for that.
I think the change to vacuumlazy.c is ok. The new test you've added
creates a table called pvactst2 but then adds a test that uses the
pvactst table.
Did you mean to skip the DROP TABLE pvactst2;?
Is there a reason to keep the maintenance_work_mem=64 for the
subsequent existing test?
David