From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com> |
Cc: | Sebastian Dressler <sebastian(at)swarm64(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Planner misestimation for JOIN with VARCHAR |
Date: | 2020-06-09 22:55:32 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvpagMB7x+vNDPZT5EfJtHw617Wve+B-V+XpYacDjvLywg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 09:05, Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> the join selectivity functions have yet to learn about extended statistics.
>
>
> That is very interesting to me. So, extended statistics would help to properly estimate the result set coming out of a single table when comparing each of those columns to one or many values, but not when joining up another table? Is that on a roadmap or in progress as far as you know?
Yeah, they're currently only used for selectivity estimates on base
table. Using extended statistics for join selectivity estimation is
being worked on [1], so there's a chance that it may happen for PG14.
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter | 2020-06-09 23:35:40 | Re: Something else about Redo Logs disappearing |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-06-09 22:21:00 | Re: Logical replication stuck in catchup state |