Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yuya Watari <watari(dot)yuya(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru>, Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Date: 2025-04-10 05:35:22
Message-ID: CAApHDvpaZNSHZOb16W2A4Tn_uED+x3UnNE7NGKx5zLJhQ0YXog@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 16:57, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:03 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > -Most operations on EquivalenceClasses should ignore child members.
> > +Most operations on EquivalenceClasses needn't look at child members.
> >
> > Would that be ok?
>
> Yeah, I think that wording works well. It avoids sounding too strict
> but still points things in the right direction.

Thanks. Pushed.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2025-04-10 05:57:04 Re: Possible api miuse bms_next_member
Previous Message Amit Langote 2025-04-10 04:57:22 Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions