From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)heterodb(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: assertion failure at cost_memoize_rescan() |
Date: | 2024-06-18 22:23:23 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvp_Fc_DFx5dzA8P6P3dCXTfeujxwBBfdXqJ7Bkcz3rX5w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 at 15:14, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 10:53 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I think the best solution is to apply the attached. I didn't test,
> > but it should fix the issue you reported and also ensure that
> > MemoizePath.calls is never zero, which would also cause issues in the
> > hit_ratio calculation in cost_memoize_rescan().
>
> +1.
Thanks for looking. Pushed.
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum | 2024-06-18 22:40:52 | Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-06-18 22:02:56 | Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring |