Re: Getting an index scan to be a parallel index scan

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alex Kaiser <alextkaiser(at)gmail(dot)com>, pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting an index scan to be a parallel index scan
Date: 2023-02-02 02:11:53
Message-ID: CAApHDvpXeEak0qnNSGWbKuVGKP9uRyrRpBBgVrseu6MAU-jVOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 14:49, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If I had more timerons myself, I'd like to try to make parallel
> function scans, or parallel CTE scans, work...

I've not really looked in detail but I thought parallel VALUES scan
might be easier than those two.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Kaiser 2023-02-02 05:00:09 Re: Getting an index scan to be a parallel index scan
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-02-02 01:48:14 Re: Getting an index scan to be a parallel index scan