Re: Why is parula failing?

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tharakan, Robins" <tharar(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is parula failing?
Date: 2024-04-10 00:54:10
Message-ID: CAApHDvpNhN9D1dqwnQ1fyPU+_MMuHapZyhPJyb1PJpBWzKcjbA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 15:48, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Still no partition_prune failures on master since the compiler version
> change. There has been one [1] in REL_16_STABLE. I'm thinking it
> might be worth backpatching the partition_prune debug to REL_16_STABLE
> to see if we can learn anything new from it.

Master failed today for the first time since the compiler upgrade.
Again reltuples == 48.

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=parula&dt=2024-04-10%2000%3A27%3A02

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-04-10 00:55:36 Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25%
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-04-10 00:43:23 Re: broken JIT support on Fedora 40