Re: pb with join plan

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marc Millas <marc(dot)millas(at)mokadb(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pb with join plan
Date: 2023-06-20 22:54:36
Message-ID: CAApHDvpG5+uGMLpFCccA-AnafBQpHSyVcqyPsVibC15wbyLf=g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 10:26, Marc Millas <marc(dot)millas(at)mokadb(dot)com> wrote:
> link to the plan with both clauses ORed (the one not finishing) https://explain.depesz.com/s/jHO2

I'd go with the UNION or UNION ALL idea I mentioned earlier.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dominique Devienne 2023-06-21 07:48:29 Re: foreign keys on multiple parent table
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2023-06-20 22:32:07 Re: strange behavior of .pgpass file