| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | cyg0810(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17067: FailedAssertion at castNodeImpl |
| Date: | 2021-06-21 14:18:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvpCOxxskM16wunXBz_w2BXptjoaRy9_CNLvYtvij__XXw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 01:33, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm quite surprised that we don't have a test that picks this up.
>
> The code coverage report shows that we *do* have tests that run
> through this code, so the existing typing is okay in the test cases
> we have. I'm guessing the real problem is that something upstream is
> generating the wrong type of list in this example.
My analysis into why that test passes is in [1]. Did you miss that or
did you have another idea?
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-21 14:24:58 | Re: BUG #17067: FailedAssertion at castNodeImpl |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-21 13:33:29 | Re: BUG #17067: FailedAssertion at castNodeImpl |