Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Date: 2021-05-11 00:35:28
Message-ID: CAApHDvozo0vm12m-Gv2nTN0xw_0q_CAShCBXr4s+mx38VwRSrw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks for making the updates.

On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 05:07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 08:52:44PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > > Improve the performance of parallel sequential scans (Thomas Munro, David Rowley)
> >
> > I think it is worth mentioning "I/O" before "performance". This
> > change won't really help cases if all the table's pages are already in
> > shared buffers.
>
> I went with:
>
> Improve the performance of parallel sequential I/O scans (Thomas Munro,
> David Rowley)

I think I'd have gone with:

"Improve I/O performance of parallel sequential scans (Thomas Munro,
David Rowley)"

The operation we're speeding up is called sequential scan. We don't
have any operation that's named sequential I/O scan.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-05-11 00:55:20 Zeroing partial pages in walreceiver
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2021-05-11 00:16:44 Re: seawasp failing, maybe in glibc allocator