Re: Do we still need parent column in pg_backend_memory_context?

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Do we still need parent column in pg_backend_memory_context?
Date: 2024-08-12 03:43:55
Message-ID: CAApHDvouin8mdTstwMrYeOoBLSjnXW6+Ufc+XLNR9-1Q5WkfSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 17:48, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Does anyone object to making this happen? i.e. remove
> pg_backend_memory_contexts.parent column and see if anyone complains?
>
> If nobody comes up with any reasons against it, then I propose making
> this happen.

I made a few adjustments and pushed the patch. Let's see if anyone complains.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2024-08-12 03:54:32 Re: A problem about partitionwise join
Previous Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2024-08-12 03:33:05 RE: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication