Re: BUG #18051: char(N) and varchar(N) behave opposite to the documentation

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nicolas Gouteux <nicolas(dot)gouteux(at)sonarsource(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #18051: char(N) and varchar(N) behave opposite to the documentation
Date: 2023-08-09 14:43:34
Message-ID: CAApHDvooLWT0VwJ295t-wcZgXL2_9qLwszK6ioDcM9sE8Sr50w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 02:37, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> unfortunately, we didn't link to discussions in commit messages back
> then. It might be worth you searching the archives shortly before
> that date to see if anything interesting comes up.

I got curious:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/13994.1075617087%40sss.pgh.pa.us#e37381a61b6946dc120d3d4ad9e120b3

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolas Gouteux 2023-08-09 14:47:27 Re: BUG #18051: char(N) and varchar(N) behave opposite to the documentation
Previous Message David Rowley 2023-08-09 14:37:48 Re: BUG #18051: char(N) and varchar(N) behave opposite to the documentation