| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Tharakan, Robins" <tharar(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why is parula failing? |
| Date: | 2024-03-27 09:35:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvocAR2=YSWvJDZBNBd9M8E_cKig8tR7wLgzUg1H0GTeGQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 18:28, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Unfortunately, REL_16_STABLE does not have the additional debugging,
> > so don't get to know what reltuples was set to.
>
> Let's wait a bit to see if it fails in HEAD ... but if not, would
> it be reasonable to back-patch the additional debugging output?
I think REL_16_STABLE has told us that it's not an auto-vacuum issue.
I'm uncertain what a few more failures in master will tell us aside
from if reltuples == 48 is consistent or if that value is going to
fluctuate.
Let's give it a week and see if it fails a few more times.
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-03-27 09:47:54 | Re: Properly pathify the union planner |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2024-03-27 09:34:10 | Re: Propagate pathkeys from CTEs up to the outer query |