Re: An oversight in ExecInitAgg for grouping sets

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: An oversight in ExecInitAgg for grouping sets
Date: 2023-03-22 08:36:36
Message-ID: CAApHDvoYkwgjDcyFMhHMBUeHG0_90_1cJAqgM_92bxxE8DpWLA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 19:18, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It occurred to me that this hasn't been applied. Should we add it to
> the CF to not lose track of it?

I have a git branch with it. That'll work for me personally as a
reminder to come back to it during the v17 cycle.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-03-22 09:00:45 Re: Transparent column encryption
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-03-22 08:20:25 Re: Reconcile stats in find_tabstat_entry() and get rid of PgStat_BackendFunctionEntry