From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Making aggregate deserialization (and WAL receive) functions slightly faster |
Date: | 2023-02-12 10:43:38 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvoWPF6PRXdzsPVSArLa_hqUnjapsOZGptRQ_CWKYeqsRw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 at 19:39, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I find this patch horribly dangerous.
I see LogicalRepApplyLoop() does something similar with a
StringInfoData. Maybe it's just scarier having an external function in
stringinfo.c which does this as having it increases the chances of
someone using it for the wrong thing.
> It could maybe be okay if we added the capability for StringInfoData
> to understand (and enforce) that its "data" buffer is read-only.
> However, that'd add overhead to every existing use-case.
I'm not very excited by that. I considered just setting maxlen = -1
in the new function and adding Asserts to check for that in each of
the appendStringInfo* functions. However, since the performance gains
are not so great, I'll probably just drop the whole thing given
there's resistance.
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2023-02-12 14:16:25 | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
Previous Message | Ankit Kumar Pandey | 2023-02-12 08:13:27 | Re: Sort optimizations: Making in-memory sort cache-aware |