From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add bump memory context type and use it for tuplesorts |
Date: | 2024-04-07 12:37:53 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvoP+MELVY5dNyw4X=16jBcdOPRdvpPAmmYyxbvvMCGqJw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 at 22:05, John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 7:37 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> I'm planning on pushing these, pending a final look at 0002 and 0003
> > on Sunday morning NZ time (UTC+12), likely in about 10 hours time.
>
> +1
I've now pushed all 3 patches. Thank you for all the reviews on
these and for the extra MemoryContextMethodID bit, Matthias.
> I haven't looked at v6, but I've tried using it in situ, and it seems
> to work as well as hoped:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANWCAZZQFfxvzO8yZHFWtQV%2BZ2gAMv1ku16Vu7KWmb5kZQyd1w%40mail.gmail.com
I'm already impressed with the radix tree work. Nice to see bump
allowing a little more memory to be saved for TID storage.
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-04-07 12:40:52 | Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-04-07 12:19:29 | Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock |