Re: Reduce TupleHashEntryData struct size by half

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reduce TupleHashEntryData struct size by half
Date: 2025-01-14 09:01:57
Message-ID: CAApHDvoCa=_eAhKkLZ=VXEG-N1JU_P0ykL1iR6iS+tEbYQt2qg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 at 11:11, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2025-01-12 at 14:54 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> > I wonder if there's some other better way of doing this. Would it be
> > worth having some function like ExecCopySlotMinimalTuple() that
> > accepts an additional parameter so that the palloc allocates N more
> > bytes at the end? Maybe it's worth hunting around to see if there's
> > any other executor nodes that could benefit from that infrastructure.
>
> That would be convenient, but doesn't seem like a great separation of
> responsibilities. Perhaps some API that separated the length
> calculation, and accepted a caller-supplied buffer?

The trick would be to ensure ExecClearTuple() still works. You
obviously don't want to try and pfree() something that isn't a pointer
to a palloc'd chunk. I'm not sure what the best API is, but I do see
there are other places that might benefit from something that allows
this. The two usages of ExecCopySlotMinimalTuple() in nodeMemoize.c
are candidates.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luca Ferrari 2025-01-14 09:08:05 question about executor hooks
Previous Message John Naylor 2025-01-14 08:58:40 Re: Sort functions with specialized comparators